Hiroshima Prefectural Hospital

16.1k citations
1.3k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Hiroshima Prefectural Hospital

1.1k papers receiving 13.5k citations

Peers

Hiroshima Prefectural Hospital
Comparison fields: 5 of 178
  • Gastroenterology 582
  • Hepatology 783
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 3.0k
  • Surgery 3.5k
  • Ophthalmology 581
Replace Kure Medical Center with:
Kure Medical Center Japan
Oita Medical Center Japan
Saiseikai Ibaraki Hospital Japan
Nara Medical University Hospital Japan
Kyoto City Hospital Japan
Kyoto first Red Cross hospital Japan
Tenri Hospital Japan
Kumamoto University Hospital Japan
Kitano Hospital Japan
Fukuoka University Hospital Japan
Hiroshima Prefectural Hospital relative to Kure Medical Center Japan Kure Medical Center's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.0×
Kure Medical Center · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Hiroshima Prefectural Hospital

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Hiroshima Prefectural Hospital. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Hiroshima Prefectural Hospital with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hiroshima Prefectural Hospital more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Hiroshima Prefectural Hospital

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Hiroshima Prefectural Hospital at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Hiroshima Prefectural Hospital at the time of their publication.

About Hiroshima Prefectural Hospital

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Hiroshima Prefectural Hospital have published 1.3k papers, which have received a total of 16.1k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 280 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, 339 papers in Surgery, 185 papers in Oncology, 36 papers in Gastroenterology and 19 papers in Internal Medicine on the topics of Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes (48 papers), Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations (40 papers), Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies (32 papers), Pituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments (29 papers), Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis (27 papers), Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (22 papers), Respiratory viral infections research (21 papers) and Helicobacter pylori-related gastroenterology studies (21 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Gastroenterology (582 citations), Hepatology (783 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (3.0k citations), Surgery (3.5k citations) and Ophthalmology (581 citations). Authors at Hiroshima Prefectural Hospital collaborate with scholars in Japan, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of Clinical Oncology, Annals of Oncology, Journal of Gastroenterology, International Journal of Clinical Oncology and World Neurosurgery. Some of Hiroshima Prefectural Hospital's most productive authors include Takashi Nishisaka, Shinji Hirai, Kazuaki Chayama, Noriaki Kurimoto, Norimasa Mitsui, Mitsuo Ochi, Ken Haruma, Shinji Tanaka, Kaoru Kurisu and Masaki Murayama.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact