Chandigarh University

13.5k papers receiving 157.9k citations

Peers

Chandigarh University
Comparison fields: 5 of 247
  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment 11.9k
  • Biomaterials 7.4k
  • Materials Chemistry 25.1k
  • Biomedical Engineering 23.5k
  • Health Informatics 716
Replace University of Petroleum and Energy Studies with:
University of Petroleum and Energy Studies India
Lovely Professional University India
Thapar Institute of Engineering & Technology India
Delhi Technological University India
Dr. B. R. Ambedkar National Institute of Technology Jalandhar India
Amity University India
Birla Institute of Technology and Science, Pilani India
SRM University India
University of Engineering and Technology Lahore Pakistan
National Institute of Technology Hamirpur India
Chandigarh University relative to University of Petroleum and Energy Studies India University of Petroleum and Energy Studies's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
University of Petroleum and Energy Studies · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Chandigarh University

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Chandigarh University. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Chandigarh University with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chandigarh University more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Chandigarh University

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Chandigarh University at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Chandigarh University at the time of their publication.

About Chandigarh University

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Chandigarh University have published 18.0k papers, which have received a total of 169.4k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 368 papers in Health Information Management, 88 papers in Health Informatics, 1.5k papers in Computer Networks and Communications, 847 papers in Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment and 1.2k papers in Information Systems on the topics of IoT and Edge/Fog Computing (542 papers), Blockchain Technology Applications and Security (457 papers), Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare (357 papers), Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques (354 papers), Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications (321 papers), Smart Agriculture and AI (289 papers), Network Security and Intrusion Detection (281 papers) and Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies (270 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment (11.9k citations), Biomaterials (7.4k citations), Materials Chemistry (25.1k citations), Biomedical Engineering (23.5k citations) and Health Informatics (716 citations). Authors at Chandigarh University collaborate with scholars in India, Saudi Arabia and United States and have published in prestigious journals including Scientific Reports, Environmental Research, RSC Advances, Chemosphere and Indian Journal of Science and Technology. Some of Chandigarh University's most productive authors include P. Senthil Kumar, Neeraj Kumar, Nitin Mittal, Gagangeet Singh Aujla, Jasgurpreet Singh Chohan, Gayathri Rangasamy, Santosh Kumar, Shubham Sharma, B.S. Sohi and Urvinder Singh.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact