Measuring stress: A guide for health and social scientists.
Impact in
- Authors
- Sheldon CohenRonald C. Kessler
- Journal
- Oxford University Press eBooks
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w7296659 →Countries where authors are citing Measuring stress: A guide for health and social scientists.
This map shows the geographic impact of Measuring stress: A guide for health and social scientists.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Measuring stress: A guide for health and social scientists. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Measuring stress: A guide for health and social scientists. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Measuring stress: A guide for health and social scientists.
This network shows the impact of Measuring stress: A guide for health and social scientists.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Measuring stress: A guide for health and social scientists..
About Measuring stress: A guide for health and social scientists.
This paper, published in 1995, received 976 indexed citations . Written by Sheldon Cohen and Ronald C. Kessler. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Clinical Psychology (270 citations), Social Psychology (184 citations), General Health Professions (157 citations), Sociology and Political Science (116 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (107 citations). Published in Oxford University Press eBooks.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w7296659.