Software processes are software too
Impact in
Classified as
- Authors
- Leon J. Osterweil
- Journal
- International Conference on Software Engineering
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.5555/41765.41766 →Countries where authors are citing Software processes are software too
This map shows the geographic impact of Software processes are software too. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Software processes are software too with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Software processes are software too more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Software processes are software too
This network shows the impact of Software processes are software too. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Software processes are software too.
About Software processes are software too
This paper, published in 1987, received 702 indexed citations . Written by Leon J. Osterweil covering the research area of Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics, Artificial Intelligence and Computer Networks and Communications. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Information Systems (585 citations), Artificial Intelligence (349 citations), Management Information Systems (300 citations), Software (152 citations) and Computer Networks and Communications (124 citations). Published in International Conference on Software Engineering.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.5555/41765.41766.