Affective Events and the Development of Leader-Member Exchange
Impact in
Classified as
- Journal
- Academy of Management Review
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.5465/amr.2014.0384 →Countries where authors are citing Affective Events and the Development of Leader-Member Exchange
This map shows the geographic impact of Affective Events and the Development of Leader-Member Exchange. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Affective Events and the Development of Leader-Member Exchange with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Affective Events and the Development of Leader-Member Exchange more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Affective Events and the Development of Leader-Member Exchange
This network shows the impact of Affective Events and the Development of Leader-Member Exchange. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Affective Events and the Development of Leader-Member Exchange.
About Affective Events and the Development of Leader-Member Exchange
This paper, published in 2016, received 270 indexed citations . Written by Russell Cropanzano, Marie T. Dasborough and Howard M. Weiss covering the research area of Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and Sociology and Political Science. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (172 citations), Social Psychology (123 citations), Sociology and Political Science (98 citations), Demography (26 citations) and Clinical Psychology (25 citations). Published in Academy of Management Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.5465/amr.2014.0384.