A practical solution to the pervasive problems ofp values
Impact in
Classified as
- Authors
- Eric‐Jan Wagenmakers
- Journal
- Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.3758/bf03194105 →Countries where authors are citing A practical solution to the pervasive problems ofp values
This map shows the geographic impact of A practical solution to the pervasive problems ofp values. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A practical solution to the pervasive problems ofp values with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A practical solution to the pervasive problems ofp values more than expected).
Fields of papers citing A practical solution to the pervasive problems ofp values
This network shows the impact of A practical solution to the pervasive problems ofp values. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the A practical solution to the pervasive problems ofp values.
About A practical solution to the pervasive problems ofp values
This paper, published in 2007, received 1.9k indexed citations . Written by Eric‐Jan Wagenmakers covering the research area of Statistics and Probability and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Cognitive Neuroscience (848 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (414 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (292 citations), Social Psychology (275 citations) and Statistics and Probability (274 citations). Published in Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.3758/bf03194105.