Team-based learning: A practical guide: AMEE Guide No. 65
Impact in
- Education 306
Classified as
- Journal
- Medical Teacher
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.3109/0142159x.2012.651179 →Countries where authors are citing Team-based learning: A practical guide: AMEE Guide No. 65
This map shows the geographic impact of Team-based learning: A practical guide: AMEE Guide No. 65. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Team-based learning: A practical guide: AMEE Guide No. 65 with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Team-based learning: A practical guide: AMEE Guide No. 65 more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Team-based learning: A practical guide: AMEE Guide No. 65
This network shows the impact of Team-based learning: A practical guide: AMEE Guide No. 65. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Team-based learning: A practical guide: AMEE Guide No. 65.
About Team-based learning: A practical guide: AMEE Guide No. 65
This paper, published in 2012, received 493 indexed citations . Written by Dean X. Parmelee, Larry K. Michaelsen, Sandy Cook and Patricia D. Hudes covering the research area of Biomedical Engineering, Education and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Education (306 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (148 citations), Biomedical Engineering (103 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (41 citations) and General Health Professions (32 citations). Published in Medical Teacher.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.3109/0142159x.2012.651179.