Aptitudes and Instructional Methods: A Handbook for Research on Interactions
Impact in
- Education 482
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.2307/748778 →Countries where authors are citing Aptitudes and Instructional Methods: A Handbook for Research on Interactions
This map shows the geographic impact of Aptitudes and Instructional Methods: A Handbook for Research on Interactions. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Aptitudes and Instructional Methods: A Handbook for Research on Interactions with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Aptitudes and Instructional Methods: A Handbook for Research on Interactions more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Aptitudes and Instructional Methods: A Handbook for Research on Interactions
This network shows the impact of Aptitudes and Instructional Methods: A Handbook for Research on Interactions. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Aptitudes and Instructional Methods: A Handbook for Research on Interactions.
About Aptitudes and Instructional Methods: A Handbook for Research on Interactions
This paper, published in 1978, received 1.2k indexed citations . Written by Douglas B. McLeod, Lee J. Cronbach and Richard E. Snow. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Developmental and Educational Psychology (531 citations), Education (482 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (301 citations), Social Psychology (155 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (124 citations). Published in Journal for Research in Mathematics Education.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.2307/748778.