Race, Sociopolitical Participation, and Black Empowerment
Impact in
Classified as
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.2307/1963525 →Countries where authors are citing Race, Sociopolitical Participation, and Black Empowerment
This map shows the geographic impact of Race, Sociopolitical Participation, and Black Empowerment. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Race, Sociopolitical Participation, and Black Empowerment with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Race, Sociopolitical Participation, and Black Empowerment more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Race, Sociopolitical Participation, and Black Empowerment
This network shows the impact of Race, Sociopolitical Participation, and Black Empowerment. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Race, Sociopolitical Participation, and Black Empowerment.
About Race, Sociopolitical Participation, and Black Empowerment
This paper, published in 1990, received 652 indexed citations . Written by Lawrence D. Bobo and Franklin D. Gilliam covering the research area of Gender Studies, Sociology and Political Science and Political Science and International Relations. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Political Science and International Relations (485 citations), Sociology and Political Science (367 citations), Gender Studies (257 citations), Communication (118 citations) and Strategy and Management (48 citations). Published in American Political Science Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.2307/1963525.