Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity
Impact in
Classified as
- Journal
- Economic Geography
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.2307/143601 →Countries where authors are citing Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity
This map shows the geographic impact of Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity
This network shows the impact of Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity.
About Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity
This paper, published in 1993, received 6.4k indexed citations . Written by William Edgar Boyd, Ulrich Beck and Kristin Shrader‐Frechette covering the research area of General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, Sociology and Political Science and Economics and Econometrics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Sociology and Political Science (3.5k citations), Political Science and International Relations (1.0k citations), General Health Professions (709 citations), Education (515 citations) and Global and Planetary Change (429 citations). Published in Economic Geography.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.2307/143601.