The Dependability of Behavioral Measurements: Theory of Generalizability for Scores and Profiles
Impact in
- Education 323
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.2307/1162145 →Countries where authors are citing The Dependability of Behavioral Measurements: Theory of Generalizability for Scores and Profiles
This map shows the geographic impact of The Dependability of Behavioral Measurements: Theory of Generalizability for Scores and Profiles. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The Dependability of Behavioral Measurements: Theory of Generalizability for Scores and Profiles with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Dependability of Behavioral Measurements: Theory of Generalizability for Scores and Profiles more than expected).
Fields of papers citing The Dependability of Behavioral Measurements: Theory of Generalizability for Scores and Profiles
This network shows the impact of The Dependability of Behavioral Measurements: Theory of Generalizability for Scores and Profiles. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The Dependability of Behavioral Measurements: Theory of Generalizability for Scores and Profiles.
About The Dependability of Behavioral Measurements: Theory of Generalizability for Scores and Profiles
This paper, published in 1974, received 1.6k indexed citations . Written by Philip R. Merrifield, Lee J. Cronbach, Goldine C. Gleser and Nageswari Rajaratnam. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Management Science and Operations Research (370 citations), Education (323 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (270 citations), Social Psychology (223 citations) and Clinical Psychology (222 citations). Published in American Educational Research Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.2307/1162145.