Transparent Conducting Oxides
Impact in
- Materials Chemistry 1.1k
Classified as
- Authors
- David S. GinleyClark I. Bright
- Journal
- MRS Bulletin
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1557/mrs2000.256 →Countries where authors are citing Transparent Conducting Oxides
This map shows the geographic impact of Transparent Conducting Oxides. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Transparent Conducting Oxides with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Transparent Conducting Oxides more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Transparent Conducting Oxides
This network shows the impact of Transparent Conducting Oxides. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Transparent Conducting Oxides.
About Transparent Conducting Oxides
This paper, published in 2000, received 1.3k indexed citations . Written by David S. Ginley and Clark I. Bright covering the research area of Materials Chemistry and Electrical and Electronic Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Materials Chemistry (1.1k citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (865 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (277 citations), Polymers and Plastics (257 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (148 citations). Published in MRS Bulletin.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1557/mrs2000.256.