Trust as an Organizing Principle
Impact in
Classified as
- Journal
- Organization Science
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1287/orsc.14.1.91.12814 →Countries where authors are citing Trust as an Organizing Principle
This map shows the geographic impact of Trust as an Organizing Principle. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Trust as an Organizing Principle with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Trust as an Organizing Principle more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Trust as an Organizing Principle
This network shows the impact of Trust as an Organizing Principle. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Trust as an Organizing Principle.
About Trust as an Organizing Principle
This paper, published in 2003, received 1.1k indexed citations . Written by Bill McEvily, Vincenzo Perrone and Akbar Zaheer covering the research area of Strategy and Management, Sociology and Political Science and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Strategy and Management (481 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (337 citations), Sociology and Political Science (294 citations), Communication (219 citations) and Management Information Systems (183 citations). Published in Organization Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1287/orsc.14.1.91.12814.