Business Model Design and the Performance of Entrepreneurial Firms
Impact in
Classified as
- Authors
- Christoph ZottRaphael Amit
- Journal
- Organization Science
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1060.0232 →Countries where authors are citing Business Model Design and the Performance of Entrepreneurial Firms
This map shows the geographic impact of Business Model Design and the Performance of Entrepreneurial Firms. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Business Model Design and the Performance of Entrepreneurial Firms with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Business Model Design and the Performance of Entrepreneurial Firms more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Business Model Design and the Performance of Entrepreneurial Firms
This network shows the impact of Business Model Design and the Performance of Entrepreneurial Firms. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Business Model Design and the Performance of Entrepreneurial Firms.
About Business Model Design and the Performance of Entrepreneurial Firms
This paper, published in 2007, received 1.3k indexed citations . Written by Christoph Zott and Raphael Amit covering the research area of Strategy and Management, Accounting and Economics and Econometrics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Strategy and Management (878 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (399 citations), Marketing (308 citations), Accounting (175 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (164 citations). Published in Organization Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1060.0232.