OR FORUM—The Evolution of Closed-Loop Supply Chain Research
Impact in
Classified as
- Journal
- Operations Research
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1287/opre.1080.0628 →Countries where authors are citing OR FORUM—The Evolution of Closed-Loop Supply Chain Research
This map shows the geographic impact of OR FORUM—The Evolution of Closed-Loop Supply Chain Research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by OR FORUM—The Evolution of Closed-Loop Supply Chain Research with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites OR FORUM—The Evolution of Closed-Loop Supply Chain Research more than expected).
Fields of papers citing OR FORUM—The Evolution of Closed-Loop Supply Chain Research
This network shows the impact of OR FORUM—The Evolution of Closed-Loop Supply Chain Research. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the OR FORUM—The Evolution of Closed-Loop Supply Chain Research.
About OR FORUM—The Evolution of Closed-Loop Supply Chain Research
This paper, published in 2009, received 1.1k indexed citations . Written by V. Daniel R. Guide and Luk N. Van Wassenhove covering the research area of Strategy and Management and Management Information Systems. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Strategy and Management (988 citations), Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (457 citations), Management Information Systems (444 citations), Marketing (318 citations) and Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (126 citations). Published in Operations Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1287/opre.1080.0628.