Gender differences in food choice: The contribution of health beliefs and dieting
Impact in
- Authors
- Anne M. HaaseAndrew SteptoeMaream Nillapun
- Journal
- Annals of Behavioral Medicine
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1207/s15324796abm2702_5 →Countries where authors are citing Gender differences in food choice: The contribution of health beliefs and dieting
This map shows the geographic impact of Gender differences in food choice: The contribution of health beliefs and dieting. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gender differences in food choice: The contribution of health beliefs and dieting with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gender differences in food choice: The contribution of health beliefs and dieting more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Gender differences in food choice: The contribution of health beliefs and dieting
This network shows the impact of Gender differences in food choice: The contribution of health beliefs and dieting. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Gender differences in food choice: The contribution of health beliefs and dieting.
About Gender differences in food choice: The contribution of health beliefs and dieting
This paper, published in 2004, received 1.1k indexed citations . Written by Anne M. Haase, Andrew Steptoe and Maream Nillapun. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (434 citations), Clinical Psychology (174 citations), Food Science (146 citations), General Health Professions (119 citations) and Nutrition and Dietetics (93 citations). Published in Annals of Behavioral Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1207/s15324796abm2702_5.