Media, society, world: Social theory and digital media practice
Impact in
- Communication 223
Classified as
- Authors
- Mark Brewin
- Journal
- New Media & Society
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1177/1461444813496212 →Countries where authors are citing Media, society, world: Social theory and digital media practice
This map shows the geographic impact of Media, society, world: Social theory and digital media practice. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Media, society, world: Social theory and digital media practice with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Media, society, world: Social theory and digital media practice more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Media, society, world: Social theory and digital media practice
This network shows the impact of Media, society, world: Social theory and digital media practice. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Media, society, world: Social theory and digital media practice.
About Media, society, world: Social theory and digital media practice
This paper, published in 2013, received 466 indexed citations . Written by Mark Brewin covering the research area of Communication. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Sociology and Political Science (229 citations), Communication (223 citations), Gender Studies (70 citations), Political Science and International Relations (39 citations) and Philosophy (32 citations). Published in New Media & Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1177/1461444813496212.