Estimating Mediated Effects in Prevention Studies
Impact in
Classified as
- Authors
- David P. MacKinnonJames H. Dwyer
- Journal
- Evaluation Review
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1177/0193841x9301700202 →Countries where authors are citing Estimating Mediated Effects in Prevention Studies
This map shows the geographic impact of Estimating Mediated Effects in Prevention Studies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Estimating Mediated Effects in Prevention Studies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Estimating Mediated Effects in Prevention Studies more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Estimating Mediated Effects in Prevention Studies
This network shows the impact of Estimating Mediated Effects in Prevention Studies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Estimating Mediated Effects in Prevention Studies.
About Estimating Mediated Effects in Prevention Studies
This paper, published in 1993, received 1.6k indexed citations . Written by David P. MacKinnon and James H. Dwyer covering the research area of General Health Professions, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences and Statistics and Probability. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Clinical Psychology (373 citations), Sociology and Political Science (278 citations), Social Psychology (263 citations), General Health Professions (184 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (122 citations). Published in Evaluation Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1177/0193841x9301700202.