Transfer of Training: A Meta-Analytic Review
Impact in
Classified as
- Journal
- Journal of Management
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1177/0149206309352880 →Countries where authors are citing Transfer of Training: A Meta-Analytic Review
This map shows the geographic impact of Transfer of Training: A Meta-Analytic Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Transfer of Training: A Meta-Analytic Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Transfer of Training: A Meta-Analytic Review more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Transfer of Training: A Meta-Analytic Review
This network shows the impact of Transfer of Training: A Meta-Analytic Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Transfer of Training: A Meta-Analytic Review.
About Transfer of Training: A Meta-Analytic Review
This paper, published in 2009, received 1.1k indexed citations . Written by Brian D. Blume, J. Kevin Ford, Timothy T. Baldwin and Jason L. W. Huang covering the research area of Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Applied Psychology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Applied Psychology (568 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (467 citations), Education (212 citations), Social Psychology (210 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (70 citations). Published in Journal of Management.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1177/0149206309352880.