Values and Behavior: Strength and Structure of Relations
Impact in
Classified as
- Authors
- Anat BardiShalom H. Schwartz
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1177/0146167203254602 →Countries where authors are citing Values and Behavior: Strength and Structure of Relations
This map shows the geographic impact of Values and Behavior: Strength and Structure of Relations. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Values and Behavior: Strength and Structure of Relations with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Values and Behavior: Strength and Structure of Relations more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Values and Behavior: Strength and Structure of Relations
This network shows the impact of Values and Behavior: Strength and Structure of Relations. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Values and Behavior: Strength and Structure of Relations.
About Values and Behavior: Strength and Structure of Relations
This paper, published in 2003, received 1.2k indexed citations . Written by Anat Bardi and Shalom H. Schwartz covering the research area of Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology and Sociology and Political Science. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Social Psychology (655 citations), Sociology and Political Science (490 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (187 citations), Marketing (155 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (150 citations). Published in Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1177/0146167203254602.