Book Review: Measurement and Classification of Psychiatric Symptoms
Impact in
- Authors
- Robert G. Priest
- Journal
- Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1177/003591577506800751 →Countries where authors are citing Book Review: Measurement and Classification of Psychiatric Symptoms
This map shows the geographic impact of Book Review: Measurement and Classification of Psychiatric Symptoms. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Book Review: Measurement and Classification of Psychiatric Symptoms with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Book Review: Measurement and Classification of Psychiatric Symptoms more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Book Review: Measurement and Classification of Psychiatric Symptoms
This network shows the impact of Book Review: Measurement and Classification of Psychiatric Symptoms. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Book Review: Measurement and Classification of Psychiatric Symptoms.
About Book Review: Measurement and Classification of Psychiatric Symptoms
This paper, published in 1975, received 1.9k indexed citations . Written by Robert G. Priest. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Psychiatry and Mental health (961 citations), Clinical Psychology (640 citations), Philosophy (363 citations), Social Psychology (342 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (227 citations). Published in Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1177/003591577506800751.