Intracerebral Hemorrhage After Intravenous t-PA Therapy for Ischemic Stroke
Impact in
- Epidemiology 531
- Neurology 206
Classified as
- Journal
- Stroke
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1161/01.str.28.11.2109 →Countries where authors are citing Intracerebral Hemorrhage After Intravenous t-PA Therapy for Ischemic Stroke
This map shows the geographic impact of Intracerebral Hemorrhage After Intravenous t-PA Therapy for Ischemic Stroke. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Intracerebral Hemorrhage After Intravenous t-PA Therapy for Ischemic Stroke with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Intracerebral Hemorrhage After Intravenous t-PA Therapy for Ischemic Stroke more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Intracerebral Hemorrhage After Intravenous t-PA Therapy for Ischemic Stroke
This network shows the impact of Intracerebral Hemorrhage After Intravenous t-PA Therapy for Ischemic Stroke. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Intracerebral Hemorrhage After Intravenous t-PA Therapy for Ischemic Stroke.
About Intracerebral Hemorrhage After Intravenous t-PA Therapy for Ischemic Stroke
This paper, published in 1997, received 747 indexed citations . covering the research area of Epidemiology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Epidemiology (531 citations), Neurology (206 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (161 citations), Rehabilitation (102 citations) and Internal Medicine (99 citations). Published in Stroke.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1161/01.str.28.11.2109.