A new model of bilateral hemispheric ischemia in the unanesthetized rat.
Impact in
Classified as
- Journal
- Stroke
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1161/01.str.10.3.267 →Countries where authors are citing A new model of bilateral hemispheric ischemia in the unanesthetized rat.
This map shows the geographic impact of A new model of bilateral hemispheric ischemia in the unanesthetized rat.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A new model of bilateral hemispheric ischemia in the unanesthetized rat. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A new model of bilateral hemispheric ischemia in the unanesthetized rat. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing A new model of bilateral hemispheric ischemia in the unanesthetized rat.
This network shows the impact of A new model of bilateral hemispheric ischemia in the unanesthetized rat.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the A new model of bilateral hemispheric ischemia in the unanesthetized rat..
About A new model of bilateral hemispheric ischemia in the unanesthetized rat.
This paper, published in 1979, received 1.8k indexed citations . Written by W. A. Pulsinelli and James Brassey Brierley covering the research area of Neurology, Developmental Neuroscience and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (918 citations), Molecular Biology (637 citations), Neurology (600 citations), Physiology (276 citations) and Developmental Neuroscience (253 citations). Published in Stroke.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1161/01.str.10.3.267.