Canadian Implantable Defibrillator Study (CIDS)
Impact in
Classified as
- Journal
- Circulation
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.101.11.1297 →Countries where authors are citing Canadian Implantable Defibrillator Study (CIDS)
This map shows the geographic impact of Canadian Implantable Defibrillator Study (CIDS). It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Canadian Implantable Defibrillator Study (CIDS) with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Canadian Implantable Defibrillator Study (CIDS) more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Canadian Implantable Defibrillator Study (CIDS)
This network shows the impact of Canadian Implantable Defibrillator Study (CIDS). Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Canadian Implantable Defibrillator Study (CIDS).
About Canadian Implantable Defibrillator Study (CIDS)
This paper, published in 2000, received 1.1k indexed citations . Written by Stuart J. Connolly, Michael Gent, Robin S. Roberts, Paul Dorian, Denis‐Claude Roy, Robert S. Sheldon, L. Brent Mitchell, Martin S. Green, George J. Klein and Bernard O’Brien covering the research area of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (992 citations), Emergency Medicine (46 citations), Surgery (46 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (27 citations) and Neurology (16 citations). Published in Circulation.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.101.11.1297.