A Tumorigenic Subpopulation with Stem Cell Properties in Melanomas
Impact in
- Oncology 775
Classified as
- Journal
- Cancer Research
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.can-05-1343 →Countries where authors are citing A Tumorigenic Subpopulation with Stem Cell Properties in Melanomas
This map shows the geographic impact of A Tumorigenic Subpopulation with Stem Cell Properties in Melanomas. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A Tumorigenic Subpopulation with Stem Cell Properties in Melanomas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A Tumorigenic Subpopulation with Stem Cell Properties in Melanomas more than expected).
Fields of papers citing A Tumorigenic Subpopulation with Stem Cell Properties in Melanomas
This network shows the impact of A Tumorigenic Subpopulation with Stem Cell Properties in Melanomas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the A Tumorigenic Subpopulation with Stem Cell Properties in Melanomas.
About A Tumorigenic Subpopulation with Stem Cell Properties in Melanomas
This paper, published in 2005, received 1.1k indexed citations . Written by Dong Fang, Thiennga K. Nguyen, Angela N. Kulp, Susan Hotz, Xiaowei Xu, David E. Elder and Meenhard Herlyn covering the research area of Oncology, Molecular Biology and Biomedical Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Oncology (775 citations), Molecular Biology (547 citations), Cancer Research (197 citations), Immunology (163 citations) and Cell Biology (118 citations). Published in Cancer Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.can-05-1343.