Inferotemporal Cortex and Object Vision
Impact in
Classified as
- Authors
- Keiji Tanaka
- Journal
- Annual Review of Neuroscience
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ne.19.030196.000545 →Countries where authors are citing Inferotemporal Cortex and Object Vision
This map shows the geographic impact of Inferotemporal Cortex and Object Vision. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Inferotemporal Cortex and Object Vision with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Inferotemporal Cortex and Object Vision more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Inferotemporal Cortex and Object Vision
This network shows the impact of Inferotemporal Cortex and Object Vision. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Inferotemporal Cortex and Object Vision.
About Inferotemporal Cortex and Object Vision
This paper, published in 1996, received 1.1k indexed citations . Written by Keiji Tanaka covering the research area of Cognitive Neuroscience. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Cognitive Neuroscience (976 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (156 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (145 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (95 citations) and Social Psychology (93 citations). Published in Annual Review of Neuroscience.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ne.19.030196.000545.