QUANTIFICATION OF UNCERTAINTY IN COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS
Impact in
Classified as
- Authors
- Patrick J. Roache
- Journal
- Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1146/annurev.fluid.29.1.123 →Countries where authors are citing QUANTIFICATION OF UNCERTAINTY IN COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS
This map shows the geographic impact of QUANTIFICATION OF UNCERTAINTY IN COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by QUANTIFICATION OF UNCERTAINTY IN COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites QUANTIFICATION OF UNCERTAINTY IN COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS more than expected).
Fields of papers citing QUANTIFICATION OF UNCERTAINTY IN COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS
This network shows the impact of QUANTIFICATION OF UNCERTAINTY IN COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the QUANTIFICATION OF UNCERTAINTY IN COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS.
About QUANTIFICATION OF UNCERTAINTY IN COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS
This paper, published in 1997, received 1.8k indexed citations . Written by Patrick J. Roache covering the research area of Computational Mechanics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Computational Mechanics (929 citations), Aerospace Engineering (569 citations), Environmental Engineering (424 citations), Mechanical Engineering (359 citations) and Ocean Engineering (241 citations). Published in Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1146/annurev.fluid.29.1.123.