Biodiversity and Litter Decomposition in Terrestrial Ecosystems
Impact in
- Soil Science 533
Classified as
Countries where authors are citing Biodiversity and Litter Decomposition in Terrestrial Ecosystems
This map shows the geographic impact of Biodiversity and Litter Decomposition in Terrestrial Ecosystems. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Biodiversity and Litter Decomposition in Terrestrial Ecosystems with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Biodiversity and Litter Decomposition in Terrestrial Ecosystems more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Biodiversity and Litter Decomposition in Terrestrial Ecosystems
This network shows the impact of Biodiversity and Litter Decomposition in Terrestrial Ecosystems. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Biodiversity and Litter Decomposition in Terrestrial Ecosystems.
About Biodiversity and Litter Decomposition in Terrestrial Ecosystems
This paper, published in 2005, received 1.4k indexed citations . Written by Stephan Hättenschwiler, Alexei V. Tiunov and Stefan Scheu covering the research area of Nature and Landscape Conservation, Plant Science and Insect Science. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Nature and Landscape Conservation (597 citations), Soil Science (533 citations), Ecology (511 citations), Plant Science (340 citations) and Insect Science (306 citations). Published in Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.36.112904.151932.