A safe, efficient regression test selection technique
Impact in
- Software 576
Classified as
- Authors
- Gregg RothermelMary Jean Harrold
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1145/248233.248262 →Countries where authors are citing A safe, efficient regression test selection technique
This map shows the geographic impact of A safe, efficient regression test selection technique. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A safe, efficient regression test selection technique with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A safe, efficient regression test selection technique more than expected).
Fields of papers citing A safe, efficient regression test selection technique
This network shows the impact of A safe, efficient regression test selection technique. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the A safe, efficient regression test selection technique.
About A safe, efficient regression test selection technique
This paper, published in 1997, received 596 indexed citations . Written by Gregg Rothermel and Mary Jean Harrold covering the research area of Software and Information Systems. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Software (576 citations), Information Systems (432 citations), Computer Networks and Communications (131 citations), Hardware and Architecture (33 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (30 citations). Published in ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1145/248233.248262.