Hole Compensation Mechanism of P-Type GaN Films
Impact in
Classified as
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1143/jjap.31.1258 →Countries where authors are citing Hole Compensation Mechanism of P-Type GaN Films
This map shows the geographic impact of Hole Compensation Mechanism of P-Type GaN Films. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hole Compensation Mechanism of P-Type GaN Films with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hole Compensation Mechanism of P-Type GaN Films more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Hole Compensation Mechanism of P-Type GaN Films
This network shows the impact of Hole Compensation Mechanism of P-Type GaN Films. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Hole Compensation Mechanism of P-Type GaN Films.
About Hole Compensation Mechanism of P-Type GaN Films
This paper, published in 1992, received 946 indexed citations . Written by Shuji Nakamura, Naruhito Iwasa, Masayuki Senoh and Takashi Mukai covering the research area of Biomedical Engineering, Condensed Matter Physics and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Condensed Matter Physics (848 citations), Materials Chemistry (394 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (388 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (384 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (318 citations). Published in Japanese Journal of Applied Physics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1143/jjap.31.1258.