Global incidence of oesophageal cancer by histological subtype in 2012
Impact in
- Surgery 619
Classified as
- Journal
- Gut
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2014-308124 →Countries where authors are citing Global incidence of oesophageal cancer by histological subtype in 2012
This map shows the geographic impact of Global incidence of oesophageal cancer by histological subtype in 2012. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Global incidence of oesophageal cancer by histological subtype in 2012 with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Global incidence of oesophageal cancer by histological subtype in 2012 more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Global incidence of oesophageal cancer by histological subtype in 2012
This network shows the impact of Global incidence of oesophageal cancer by histological subtype in 2012. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Global incidence of oesophageal cancer by histological subtype in 2012.
About Global incidence of oesophageal cancer by histological subtype in 2012
This paper, published in 2014, received 1.1k indexed citations . Written by Melina Arnold, Isabelle Soerjomataram, Jacques Ferlay and David Forman covering the research area of Surgery. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Surgery (619 citations), Molecular Biology (244 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (220 citations), Oncology (190 citations) and Cancer Research (140 citations). Published in Gut.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2014-308124.