Photonic Band Gap Guidance in Optical Fibers
Impact in
Classified as
- Journal
- Science
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1126/science.282.5393.1476 →Countries where authors are citing Photonic Band Gap Guidance in Optical Fibers
This map shows the geographic impact of Photonic Band Gap Guidance in Optical Fibers. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Photonic Band Gap Guidance in Optical Fibers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Photonic Band Gap Guidance in Optical Fibers more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Photonic Band Gap Guidance in Optical Fibers
This network shows the impact of Photonic Band Gap Guidance in Optical Fibers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Photonic Band Gap Guidance in Optical Fibers.
About Photonic Band Gap Guidance in Optical Fibers
This paper, published in 1998, received 991 indexed citations . Written by J. C. Knight, Jes Broeng, Tim A. Birks and Philip St.J. Russell covering the research area of Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering (871 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (646 citations), Biomedical Engineering (84 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (70 citations) and Surfaces, Coatings and Films (56 citations). Published in Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1126/science.282.5393.1476.