Vernalization-Mediated Epigenetic Silencing by a Long Intronic Noncoding RNA
Impact in
- Plant Science 703
Classified as
- Authors
- Jae Bok HeoSibum Sung
- Journal
- Science
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1126/science.1197349 →Countries where authors are citing Vernalization-Mediated Epigenetic Silencing by a Long Intronic Noncoding RNA
This map shows the geographic impact of Vernalization-Mediated Epigenetic Silencing by a Long Intronic Noncoding RNA. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Vernalization-Mediated Epigenetic Silencing by a Long Intronic Noncoding RNA with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Vernalization-Mediated Epigenetic Silencing by a Long Intronic Noncoding RNA more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Vernalization-Mediated Epigenetic Silencing by a Long Intronic Noncoding RNA
This network shows the impact of Vernalization-Mediated Epigenetic Silencing by a Long Intronic Noncoding RNA. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Vernalization-Mediated Epigenetic Silencing by a Long Intronic Noncoding RNA.
About Vernalization-Mediated Epigenetic Silencing by a Long Intronic Noncoding RNA
This paper, published in 2010, received 975 indexed citations . Written by Jae Bok Heo and Sibum Sung covering the research area of Plant Science and Molecular Biology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Plant Science (703 citations), Molecular Biology (607 citations), Cancer Research (289 citations), Endocrinology (239 citations) and Genetics (27 citations). Published in Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1126/science.1197349.