Impulse and Self-Control From a Dual-Systems Perspective
Impact in
Classified as
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01116.x →Countries where authors are citing Impulse and Self-Control From a Dual-Systems Perspective
This map shows the geographic impact of Impulse and Self-Control From a Dual-Systems Perspective. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Impulse and Self-Control From a Dual-Systems Perspective with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Impulse and Self-Control From a Dual-Systems Perspective more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Impulse and Self-Control From a Dual-Systems Perspective
This network shows the impact of Impulse and Self-Control From a Dual-Systems Perspective. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Impulse and Self-Control From a Dual-Systems Perspective.
About Impulse and Self-Control From a Dual-Systems Perspective
This paper, published in 2009, received 1.1k indexed citations . Written by Wilhelm Hofmann, Malte Friese and Fritz Strack covering the research area of Sociology and Political Science, Applied Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Applied Psychology (512 citations), Sociology and Political Science (277 citations), Clinical Psychology (276 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (273 citations) and Social Psychology (237 citations). Published in Perspectives on Psychological Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01116.x.