Does the Stock Market Rationally Reflect Fundamental Values?
Impact in
- Finance 595
Classified as
- Authors
- Lawrence H. Summers
- Journal
- The Journal of Finance
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1986.tb04519.x →Countries where authors are citing Does the Stock Market Rationally Reflect Fundamental Values?
This map shows the geographic impact of Does the Stock Market Rationally Reflect Fundamental Values?. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Does the Stock Market Rationally Reflect Fundamental Values? with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Does the Stock Market Rationally Reflect Fundamental Values? more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Does the Stock Market Rationally Reflect Fundamental Values?
This network shows the impact of Does the Stock Market Rationally Reflect Fundamental Values?. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Does the Stock Market Rationally Reflect Fundamental Values?.
About Does the Stock Market Rationally Reflect Fundamental Values?
This paper, published in 1986, received 741 indexed citations . Written by Lawrence H. Summers covering the research area of Finance and Economics and Econometrics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Finance (595 citations), Economics and Econometrics (535 citations), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (197 citations), Accounting (179 citations) and Management Science and Operations Research (85 citations). Published in The Journal of Finance.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1986.tb04519.x.