Required Sample Size to Detect the Mediated Effect
Impact in
- Clinical Psychology 1.1k
Classified as
- Journal
- Psychological Science
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01882.x →Countries where authors are citing Required Sample Size to Detect the Mediated Effect
This map shows the geographic impact of Required Sample Size to Detect the Mediated Effect. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Required Sample Size to Detect the Mediated Effect with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Required Sample Size to Detect the Mediated Effect more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Required Sample Size to Detect the Mediated Effect
This network shows the impact of Required Sample Size to Detect the Mediated Effect. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Required Sample Size to Detect the Mediated Effect.
About Required Sample Size to Detect the Mediated Effect
This paper, published in 2007, received 3.4k indexed citations . Written by Matthew S. Fritz and David P. MacKinnon covering the research area of Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Social Psychology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Clinical Psychology (1.1k citations), Social Psychology (784 citations), Sociology and Political Science (690 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (421 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (279 citations). Published in Psychological Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01882.x.