Action-Video-Game Experience Alters the Spatial Resolution of Vision
Impact in
Classified as
- Authors
- Daphné Bavelier
- Journal
- Psychological Science
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01853.x →Countries where authors are citing Action-Video-Game Experience Alters the Spatial Resolution of Vision
This map shows the geographic impact of Action-Video-Game Experience Alters the Spatial Resolution of Vision. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Action-Video-Game Experience Alters the Spatial Resolution of Vision with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Action-Video-Game Experience Alters the Spatial Resolution of Vision more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Action-Video-Game Experience Alters the Spatial Resolution of Vision
This network shows the impact of Action-Video-Game Experience Alters the Spatial Resolution of Vision. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Action-Video-Game Experience Alters the Spatial Resolution of Vision.
About Action-Video-Game Experience Alters the Spatial Resolution of Vision
This paper, published in 2007, received 689 indexed citations . Written by Daphné Bavelier covering the research area of Cognitive Neuroscience and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (274 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (252 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (223 citations), Sociology and Political Science (108 citations) and Education (105 citations). Published in Psychological Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01853.x.