Microsatellite analysis of population structure in Canadian polar bears
- Journal
- Molecular Ecology
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294x.1995.tb00227.x →Countries where authors are citing Microsatellite analysis of population structure in Canadian polar bears
This map shows the geographic impact of Microsatellite analysis of population structure in Canadian polar bears. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Microsatellite analysis of population structure in Canadian polar bears with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Microsatellite analysis of population structure in Canadian polar bears more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Microsatellite analysis of population structure in Canadian polar bears
This network shows the impact of Microsatellite analysis of population structure in Canadian polar bears. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Microsatellite analysis of population structure in Canadian polar bears.
About Microsatellite analysis of population structure in Canadian polar bears
This paper, published in 1995, received 1.8k indexed citations . Written by David Paetkau, Wendy Calvert and Curtis Strobeck covering the research area of Genetics and Ecology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Genetics (1.2k citations), Ecology (818 citations), Plant Science (332 citations), Molecular Biology (305 citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (284 citations). Published in Molecular Ecology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294x.1995.tb00227.x.