Metaheuristics—the metaphor exposed
Impact in
Classified as
- Authors
- Kenneth Sörensen
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1111/itor.12001 →Countries where authors are citing Metaheuristics—the metaphor exposed
This map shows the geographic impact of Metaheuristics—the metaphor exposed. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Metaheuristics—the metaphor exposed with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Metaheuristics—the metaphor exposed more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Metaheuristics—the metaphor exposed
This network shows the impact of Metaheuristics—the metaphor exposed. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Metaheuristics—the metaphor exposed.
About Metaheuristics—the metaphor exposed
This paper, published in 2013, received 810 indexed citations . Written by Kenneth Sörensen covering the research area of Artificial Intelligence, Computational Theory and Mathematics and Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Artificial Intelligence (483 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (284 citations), Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (153 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (79 citations) and Control and Systems Engineering (72 citations). Published in International Transactions in Operational Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1111/itor.12001.