Fitness Effects on the Cognitive Function of Older Adults
Impact in
Classified as
- Journal
- Psychological Science
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.t01-1-01430 →Countries where authors are citing Fitness Effects on the Cognitive Function of Older Adults
This map shows the geographic impact of Fitness Effects on the Cognitive Function of Older Adults. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fitness Effects on the Cognitive Function of Older Adults with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fitness Effects on the Cognitive Function of Older Adults more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Fitness Effects on the Cognitive Function of Older Adults
This network shows the impact of Fitness Effects on the Cognitive Function of Older Adults. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Fitness Effects on the Cognitive Function of Older Adults.
About Fitness Effects on the Cognitive Function of Older Adults
This paper, published in 2003, received 3.0k indexed citations . Written by Stanley J. Colcombe and Arthur F. Kramer covering the research area of Behavioral Neuroscience, Applied Psychology and Clinical Psychology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Psychiatry and Mental health (677 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (647 citations), Physiology (613 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (338 citations) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (256 citations). Published in Psychological Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.t01-1-01430.