Review of Visual Saliency Detection With Comprehensive Information
Impact in
Classified as
Countries where authors are citing Review of Visual Saliency Detection With Comprehensive Information
This map shows the geographic impact of Review of Visual Saliency Detection With Comprehensive Information. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Review of Visual Saliency Detection With Comprehensive Information with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Review of Visual Saliency Detection With Comprehensive Information more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Review of Visual Saliency Detection With Comprehensive Information
This network shows the impact of Review of Visual Saliency Detection With Comprehensive Information. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Review of Visual Saliency Detection With Comprehensive Information.
About Review of Visual Saliency Detection With Comprehensive Information
This paper, published in 2018, received 330 indexed citations . Written by Runmin Cong, Jianjun Lei, Huazhu Fu, Ming‐Ming Cheng, Weisi Lin and Qingming Huang covering the research area of Sensory Systems and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (296 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (70 citations), Media Technology (61 citations), Sensory Systems (37 citations) and Human-Computer Interaction (25 citations). Published in IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1109/tcsvt.2018.2870832.