Airborne Communication Networks: A Survey
Impact in
Classified as
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1109/jsac.2018.2864423 →Countries where authors are citing Airborne Communication Networks: A Survey
This map shows the geographic impact of Airborne Communication Networks: A Survey. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Airborne Communication Networks: A Survey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Airborne Communication Networks: A Survey more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Airborne Communication Networks: A Survey
This network shows the impact of Airborne Communication Networks: A Survey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Airborne Communication Networks: A Survey.
About Airborne Communication Networks: A Survey
This paper, published in 2018, received 258 indexed citations . Written by Xianbin Cao, Peng Yang, Mohamed Alzenad, Xing Xi, Dapeng Oliver Wu and Halim Yanıkömeroğlu covering the research area of Computer Networks and Communications and Aerospace Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Aerospace Engineering (216 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (145 citations), Computer Networks and Communications (124 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (23 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (6 citations). Published in IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1109/jsac.2018.2864423.