A survey of public opinion about connected vehicles in the U.S., the U.K., and Australia
Impact in
Classified as
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1109/iccve.2014.7297637 →Countries where authors are citing A survey of public opinion about connected vehicles in the U.S., the U.K., and Australia
This map shows the geographic impact of A survey of public opinion about connected vehicles in the U.S., the U.K., and Australia. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A survey of public opinion about connected vehicles in the U.S., the U.K., and Australia with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A survey of public opinion about connected vehicles in the U.S., the U.K., and Australia more than expected).
Fields of papers citing A survey of public opinion about connected vehicles in the U.S., the U.K., and Australia
This network shows the impact of A survey of public opinion about connected vehicles in the U.S., the U.K., and Australia. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the A survey of public opinion about connected vehicles in the U.S., the U.K., and Australia.
About A survey of public opinion about connected vehicles in the U.S., the U.K., and Australia
This paper, published in 2014, received 334 indexed citations . Written by Brandon Schoettle and Michael V. Sivak covering the research area of Demography, Social Psychology and Electrical and Electronic Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Automotive Engineering (210 citations), Social Psychology (203 citations), Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality (75 citations), Transportation (69 citations) and Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (39 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1109/iccve.2014.7297637.