Fuzzy Cold Dark Matter: The Wave Properties of Ultralight Particles
Impact in
Classified as
- Journal
- Physical Review Letters
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.85.1158 →Countries where authors are citing Fuzzy Cold Dark Matter: The Wave Properties of Ultralight Particles
This map shows the geographic impact of Fuzzy Cold Dark Matter: The Wave Properties of Ultralight Particles. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fuzzy Cold Dark Matter: The Wave Properties of Ultralight Particles with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fuzzy Cold Dark Matter: The Wave Properties of Ultralight Particles more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Fuzzy Cold Dark Matter: The Wave Properties of Ultralight Particles
This network shows the impact of Fuzzy Cold Dark Matter: The Wave Properties of Ultralight Particles. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Fuzzy Cold Dark Matter: The Wave Properties of Ultralight Particles.
About Fuzzy Cold Dark Matter: The Wave Properties of Ultralight Particles
This paper, published in 2000, received 1.2k indexed citations . Written by Wayne Hu, Rennan Barkana and Andrei Gruzinov covering the research area of Nuclear and High Energy Physics and Astronomy and Astrophysics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Astronomy and Astrophysics (1.0k citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (941 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (184 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (98 citations) and Instrumentation (45 citations). Published in Physical Review Letters.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.85.1158.