Three-nucleon forces from chiral effective field theory
Impact in
Classified as
- Journal
- Physical Review C
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1103/physrevc.66.064001 →Countries where authors are citing Three-nucleon forces from chiral effective field theory
This map shows the geographic impact of Three-nucleon forces from chiral effective field theory. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Three-nucleon forces from chiral effective field theory with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Three-nucleon forces from chiral effective field theory more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Three-nucleon forces from chiral effective field theory
This network shows the impact of Three-nucleon forces from chiral effective field theory. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Three-nucleon forces from chiral effective field theory.
About Three-nucleon forces from chiral effective field theory
This paper, published in 2002, received 426 indexed citations . Written by E. Epelbaum, A. Nogga, W. Glöckle, H. Kamada, Ulf-G. Meißner and H. Witała covering the research area of Nuclear and High Energy Physics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics (413 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (179 citations), Spectroscopy (68 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (35 citations) and Geophysics (29 citations). Published in Physical Review C.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1103/physrevc.66.064001.