The role of conservation agriculture in sustainable agriculture
Impact in
- Soil Science 648
- Plant Science 507
Classified as
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2007.2169 →Countries where authors are citing The role of conservation agriculture in sustainable agriculture
This map shows the geographic impact of The role of conservation agriculture in sustainable agriculture. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The role of conservation agriculture in sustainable agriculture with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The role of conservation agriculture in sustainable agriculture more than expected).
Fields of papers citing The role of conservation agriculture in sustainable agriculture
This network shows the impact of The role of conservation agriculture in sustainable agriculture. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The role of conservation agriculture in sustainable agriculture.
About The role of conservation agriculture in sustainable agriculture
This paper, published in 2007, received 1.3k indexed citations . Written by Peter Hobbs, Ken D. Sayre and Raj Kumar Gupta covering the research area of Plant Science, Agronomy and Crop Science and Soil Science. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Soil Science (648 citations), Plant Science (507 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (399 citations), General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (284 citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (267 citations). Published in Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2007.2169.