The Roland–Morris Disability Questionnaire and the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire
Impact in
- Pharmacology 940
Classified as
- Journal
- Spine
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200012150-00006 →Countries where authors are citing The Roland–Morris Disability Questionnaire and the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire
This map shows the geographic impact of The Roland–Morris Disability Questionnaire and the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The Roland–Morris Disability Questionnaire and the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Roland–Morris Disability Questionnaire and the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire more than expected).
Fields of papers citing The Roland–Morris Disability Questionnaire and the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire
This network shows the impact of The Roland–Morris Disability Questionnaire and the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The Roland–Morris Disability Questionnaire and the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire.
About The Roland–Morris Disability Questionnaire and the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire
This paper, published in 2000, received 1.6k indexed citations . Written by Martin O Roland and Jeremy C. T. Fairbank covering the research area of Pharmacology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Rehabilitation. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Pharmacology (940 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (399 citations), Surgery (181 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (117 citations) and Cell Biology (78 citations). Published in Spine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200012150-00006.