Stress and immunity in humans: a meta-analytic review.
Impact in
Classified as
- Authors
- Tracy B. HerbertSheldon Cohen
- Journal
- Psychosomatic Medicine
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1097/00006842-199307000-00004 →Countries where authors are citing Stress and immunity in humans: a meta-analytic review.
This map shows the geographic impact of Stress and immunity in humans: a meta-analytic review.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stress and immunity in humans: a meta-analytic review. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stress and immunity in humans: a meta-analytic review. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Stress and immunity in humans: a meta-analytic review.
This network shows the impact of Stress and immunity in humans: a meta-analytic review.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Stress and immunity in humans: a meta-analytic review..
About Stress and immunity in humans: a meta-analytic review.
This paper, published in 1993, received 893 indexed citations . Written by Tracy B. Herbert and Sheldon Cohen covering the research area of General Health Professions, Behavioral Neuroscience and Health. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Behavioral Neuroscience (256 citations), Clinical Psychology (158 citations), Social Psychology (155 citations), General Health Professions (155 citations) and Biological Psychiatry (124 citations). Published in Psychosomatic Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1097/00006842-199307000-00004.