REVIEW: Biofortification of Durum Wheat with Zinc and Iron
Impact in
- Plant Science 535
- Soil Science 259
Classified as
- Journal
- Cereal Chemistry
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1094/cchem-87-1-0010 →Countries where authors are citing REVIEW: Biofortification of Durum Wheat with Zinc and Iron
This map shows the geographic impact of REVIEW: Biofortification of Durum Wheat with Zinc and Iron. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by REVIEW: Biofortification of Durum Wheat with Zinc and Iron with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites REVIEW: Biofortification of Durum Wheat with Zinc and Iron more than expected).
Fields of papers citing REVIEW: Biofortification of Durum Wheat with Zinc and Iron
This network shows the impact of REVIEW: Biofortification of Durum Wheat with Zinc and Iron. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the REVIEW: Biofortification of Durum Wheat with Zinc and Iron.
About REVIEW: Biofortification of Durum Wheat with Zinc and Iron
This paper, published in 2010, received 560 indexed citations . Written by İsmail Çakmak, Wolfgang Pfeiffer and Bonnie McClafferty covering the research area of Plant Science and Soil Science. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Plant Science (535 citations), Soil Science (259 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (81 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (70 citations) and Pollution (52 citations). Published in Cereal Chemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1094/cchem-87-1-0010.