Conservation of Resources Theory: Its Implication for Stress, Health, and Resilience
Impact in
- Authors
- Stevan E. Hobfoll
- Journal
- Oxford University Press eBooks
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195375343.013.0007 →Countries where authors are citing Conservation of Resources Theory: Its Implication for Stress, Health, and Resilience
This map shows the geographic impact of Conservation of Resources Theory: Its Implication for Stress, Health, and Resilience. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Conservation of Resources Theory: Its Implication for Stress, Health, and Resilience with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Conservation of Resources Theory: Its Implication for Stress, Health, and Resilience more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Conservation of Resources Theory: Its Implication for Stress, Health, and Resilience
This network shows the impact of Conservation of Resources Theory: Its Implication for Stress, Health, and Resilience. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Conservation of Resources Theory: Its Implication for Stress, Health, and Resilience.
About Conservation of Resources Theory: Its Implication for Stress, Health, and Resilience
This paper, published in 2010, received 544 indexed citations . Written by Stevan E. Hobfoll. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (188 citations), Clinical Psychology (172 citations), Sociology and Political Science (148 citations), Social Psychology (148 citations) and General Health Professions (118 citations). Published in Oxford University Press eBooks.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195375343.013.0007.